Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2017 15:28:08 GMT -6
Fantrax will have players designated DE ot DT or both in some cases, All separating them does is it gives DT more meaning, if they're lumped in with DE they tend to become fairly valueless and not worth much more than basic salary. Me paying up to 5 M (Buckner) for someone scoring less than the worst kicker would be a waste of resources
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2017 15:42:26 GMT -6
Agree with the general consensus on this. However, we need to decide this asap. I'm not paying an expensive DT for him to be out scored by ever DE in the league. We have to know this before rosters lock.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 6:45:45 GMT -6
Consider this
In my other dynasty league the scoring D lineup is
2 DE
2 DT
2 OLB
1 ILB\MLB
2 CB
2 S
1 Utill
This matches a starting D on the field in a game
with half the teams playing a 3\4 defense MLB designated players are scarcer, so a ILB is an option
Just a thought
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 6:51:36 GMT -6
Can't differentiate Linebackers on fantrax as far as I can see, we'd have to manually check every line up before ko to see if valid line up is set
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 8:33:28 GMT -6
If we were to split it, LB and DO would have an even amount, and there would be u til to make the differe ce between 3-4 and 4-3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 15:39:11 GMT -6
Just curious but is there any concern about splitting up DL and DB and then having our roster max too low? 40 is aful low when you have to carry more players
|
|
|
|
Post by Ravens GM (Frank) on Jul 23, 2017 15:52:46 GMT -6
Agreed Blaine, 40 man rosters are low when your both trying to compete and protect your young players.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 17:58:43 GMT -6
The 1000000000 cap hurts roster depth more
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 18:01:59 GMT -6
I think the cap number is fine, it is the roster max that is a little low
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 18:07:57 GMT -6
I could not fill a 40 man roster with the current cap
Going to end up with about 30
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 18:15:34 GMT -6
You only need 25 minimum.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 18:27:49 GMT -6
Teams bye week is a automatic loss
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 18:36:11 GMT -6
thats why u trade and draft and dip into FA...we all start with the same issue its part of being in a league like this
|
|
|
|
Post by Ravens GM (Frank) on Jul 23, 2017 18:46:36 GMT -6
The way the league was started was to give every GM a unique scenario to deal with, a challenge to test managerial skills. It was never meant to field a complete line-up, as many GM's who protected 20M LB's and 12M CB's will soon find out. The 100M cap is perfect, and as a league market based value contracts will develop as the league matures from its infancy up to adulthood in a few short years. The biggest mistake a GM can make at the moment is believing is or she has to field a team ASAP. Its a process, and the more skilled GM's will figure out what their situation is and adapt quickly, while others will have to go through some growing pains.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 20:03:56 GMT -6
Do we just use the 2017 cap hit, or use the cap hit by year? Would be a lot simpler just to use 2017 since we don't escalate Rookie or UFA deals.
|
|
