New England and San Francisco

[Deleted]

New England gets

San Francisco 2018 1st
San Francisco 2019 2nd

San Francisco gets

Jimmy Garopplo 2018 $ 1.1 M

I accept

[Deleted]

Niners accept, sorry been without Internet at work today for some reason so not able to get on til now

This is a risky move for what we believe is a real talent, something to build our roster round over the coming seasons. Garoppolo and maybe the best offensive coach in the NFL together is mouthwatering. McVay and Goff goodness is what we're hoping for.

Good dealing Patriots

[Vikings GM(Jeremy)]

I don’t see the value for 49ers getting a guy who is basically a rental, unless he tags him, for 2 picks, I just don’t see this as being good for SF at all. As much as I hate to do it, I’m going to have to veto this one. 0-1

[Deleted]

And if he tags him and he turns out to be as good as everyone says he is

We are both taking chances here ,

Brady could retire next year and I would be without a QB

[Deleted]

Garoppolo's contract is wrong above ...he's 2017: $0.434, not 2018: $1.1

[Deleted]

Sorry

You are correct

[Deleted]

patriots if brady retires you get $22 million in salary plus a first and 2nd round draft pick. your risk is way lower than the 49ers. with $22 million you have a good chance of signing a free agent or drafting a QB with the first round pick or using the picks to trade for a QB. just my opinion. that and the trade should be void since the terms were not correct in the original post

[Deleted]

I referenced the roster spread sheet attached to the league and it stated 1.1 , I got the year wrong
Sorry
I appreciate your opinion, but wish you had communicated that to me one on one , not here
You are not a trade committee member as far as I know

[Steelers GM (Mikey)]

Tyler is new, he probly doesn't know their is a trade discussion thread
But yes TC members should only be posting in this thread.

This trade is def a gamble for both sides. As I understand Jeremy's vote, starting QBs don't come cheap.. Now with new rules being talked about a couple months ago with LM and TC members this could help the 49ers and resigning JG.
This might be more of a gamble for the Pats, as trading him leaves him with no back up QB. Better chance of Brady getting hurt then retiring.. but I don't see this trade being vetoable
Approve (1-1)

[Deleted]

I think there is a heavy price here for Jimmy G considering he is mostly unproven but I don’t think it’s vetoable.
Approve 2-1

[Steelers GM (Mikey)]

I've had a few days to think about this trade & looking back on the cam newton trade and what he got for him,  I think this is a very steep price for JG.  Fair value for him would be taking out the first and maybe adding something lower...   since we are waiting forever for other TC members to vote I will me changing my vote to veto.   

Veto 
(1-2)

[Ravens GM (Frank)]

If I understand the context of the trade correctly, its a half a year deal so the 49ers can make a wild card push, and for that he gives up a 1st and a 2nd.

I think its not the wisest move you can make, however I am not going to shut down anybody's ability to make a playoff push at the same time. My general rule for a good starting QB is two 1srt rounders, and because we know very little about Garapallo it makes that value a little tough. I dont think its a smart move going forward beyond the next few weeks, but we cannot stop GMs from making stupid decisions. Is this trade detrimental to the league, I don't think so. And, while I really dont like it for the 49ers, I dont think its veto-able.

APPROVE 2-2

[Deleted]

Really , changing a vote because other trade members are late
And then they vote 19 minutes later ?

Shouldn't this be approved by a 3 to 1 vote

The value of Garoppllo is for next year

This is becoming frustrating to me because of all the lobbying of other teams not involved in this to veto this trade
I clearly advertised to everyone I discussed this trade with the value of Jimmy G NEXT SEASON if they tagged him

Can we get a decision , because that decision effects me greatly for next year

Thanks

[Deleted]

im going to approve...having thought about this since the trade was posted i finally come to a desision. IF
Jimmy G gets the nod this week then he may get the job for the rest of the season and if Speng then franchises him the the picks are worth it..trade is not detrimental to the league Speng is taking a chance on Jimmy and he cleearly thinks its worth it

approval 3-2

[Deleted]

I don't really see how people don't think Jimmy is worth a 1st next year and a 2nd in the following year. He is the favor to start the rest of the season and gets another year on the roster with a tag. It's not like Jimmy's value goes to zero after this trade. He still holds value and will hold value for at least a year and a half IMO. It's not out of the realm of possibility that he could potentially trade him for more than a 1st and 2nd in the offseason if he plays great for just a few games the rest of the season. It's not exactly buying him super low, but it's still a decent gamble on buy low and sell high at the very least. I'd take jimmy G at this point and I think there are a lot of other teams that wouldn't mid having him.

Approve 4-2